Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Biolimus-eluting vs. other limus-eluting stents in NSTE-ACS: A pooled analysis of GLASSY and TWILIGHT

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Vijay KunadianORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2023 Elsevier B.V.Background: Biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) may be associated with better outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to other current-generation limus-eluting stents (LES). Aims: To compare BP-BES with other current-generation LES in ACS patients undergoing PCI. Methods: We pooled individual data of Non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-ACS patients from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). The BP-BES groups consisted mostly of GLASSY patients, while the control group (other current-generation LES) included exclusively TWILIGHT patients. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis; the key secondary outcome was target-vessel failure (TVF). To account for trial design differences, outcomes were assessed at 3 months (short-term) and between 3 and 12 months (long-term) after PCI and subsequently pooled to estimate the 12-month hazards. Results: Of 7107 and 6053 NSTE-ACS patients included in the short- and long-term analysis, 32.7% and 36.5% received a BP-BES, respectively. Risk of MACE associated with BP-BES versus other LES was similar at short-term (1.1% vs 1.3%, adjusted HR 0.86, 95%CI 0.53–1.38), lower at long-term (1.7% vs 3.1%, adjusted HR 0.49, 95%CI 0.34–0.72), and lower in the entire 12-month period (pooled adjusted HR 0.61, 95%CI 0.45–0.82). The cumulative 12-month risk of TVF was reduced with BP-BES (adjusted HR 0.52, 95%CI 0.38–0.70). Conclusion: BP-BES was associated with lower 12-month risks of MACE and TVF compared to other current generation LES among NSTE-ACS patients treated with abbreviated or standard ticagrelor-based DAPT. These non-randomized findings are hypothesis-generating. Condensed abstract: Differences in clinical outcomes may exist between biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents (BP-BES) and other current-generation limus-eluting stent (LES) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We pooled individual data of about 7000 Non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients undergoing PCI and treated with ticagrelor with or without aspirin from two large randomized controlled trials (GLASSY and TWILIGHT). BP-BES patients derived very largely from GLASSY and other LES patients from TWILIGHT. In this population, BP-BES compared to other current generation LES, were associated with a lower 12-month risk of major adverse cardiovascular events and target-vessel failure.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Spirito A, Valgimigli M, Cao D, Baber U, Mehta SR, Gibson CM, Steg GP, Sharma SK, Goel R, Huber K, Kunadian V, Escaned J, Franzone A, Yaling H, Collier T, Kaul U, Kornowski R, Krucoff M, Moliterno D, Sartori S, Owen R, Zhang Z, Dangas GD, Kastrati A, Angiolillo DJ, Cohen DJ, Vranckx P, Windecker S, Pocock S, Mehran R

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: International Journal of Cardiology

Year: 2023

Volume: 383

Pages: 24-32

Print publication date: 15/07/2023

Online publication date: 18/04/2023

Acceptance date: 17/04/2023

ISSN (print): 0167-5273

ISSN (electronic): 1874-1754

Publisher: Elsevier Ireland Ltd

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.027

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.04.027

PubMed id: 37080466


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share