Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The influence of left ventricular assist device inflow cannula position on thrombosis risk

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Francesco Zonta

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© 2020 The Authors. Artificial Organs published by International Center for Artificial Organ and Transplantation (ICAOT) and Wiley Periodicals LLC.The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) as a treatment method for heart failure patients has been steadily increasing; however, pathological studies showed presence of thrombi around the HeartWare ventricular assist device inflow cannula (IC) in more than 95% of patients after device explantation. Flow fields around the IC might trigger thrombus formation and require further investigation. In this study flow dynamics parameters were evaluated for different patient geometries using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations. Left ventricular (LV) models of two LVAD patients were obtained from CT scans. The LV volumes of Patient 1 (P1) and Patient 2 (P2) were 264 and 114 cm3 with an IC angle of 20° and 9° from the mitral-IC tip axis at the coronal plane. The IC insertion site at the apex was central for P1, whereas it was lateral for P2. Transient CFD simulations were performed over 9 cardiac cycles. The wedge area was defined from the cannula tip to the wall of the LV apex. Mean velocity magnitude and blood stagnation region (volume with mean velocity <5 mm/s) as well as the wall shear stress (WSS) at the IC surface were calculated. Cardiac support resulted in a flow mainly crossing the ventricle from the mitral valve to the LVAD cannula for P2, while the main inflow jet deviated toward the septal wall in P1. Lower WSS at the IC surface and consequently larger stagnation volumes were observed for P2 (P1: 0.17, P2: 0.77 cm3). Flow fields around an LVAD cannula can be influenced by many parameters such as LV size, IC angle, and implantation site. Careful consideration of influencing parameters is essential to get reliable evaluations of the apical flow field and its connection to apical thrombus formation. Higher blood washout and lower stagnation were observed for a central implantation of the IC at the apex.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Ghodrati M, Maurer A, Schloglhofer T, Khienwad T, Zimpfer D, Beitzke D, Zonta F, Moscato F, Schima H, Aigner P

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Artificial Organs

Year: 2020

Volume: 44

Issue: 9

Pages: 939-946

Print publication date: 01/09/2020

Online publication date: 17/04/2020

Acceptance date: 08/04/2020

Date deposited: 07/02/2025

ISSN (print): 0160-564X

ISSN (electronic): 1525-1594

Publisher: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13705

DOI: 10.1111/aor.13705

PubMed id: 32302423


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG): M3dRES Project Nr 858060
Project of the Jubiläumsfonds of the National Bank Austria Nr 17314
Vienna Scientific Cluster (VSC) Computer Network

Share