Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Thom Brooks
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Plato justifies the concentration and exercise of power for persons endowed with expertise in political governance. This article argues that this justification takes two distinctly different sets of arguments. The first is what I shall call his 'ideal political philosophy' described primarily in the Republic as rule by philosopher-kings wielding absolute authority over their subjects. Their authority stems solely from their comprehension of justice, from which they make political judgements on behalf of their city-state. I call the second set of arguments Plato's 'practical political philosophy' underlying his later thought, where absolute rule by philosopher-kings is undermined by the impure character of all political knowledge. Whereas the complete comprehension of justice sanctions the absolute political power of those with this expertise, partial knowledge of justice disallows for such a large investment of power. Plato's practical political philosophy argues for a mixed theory of governance fusing the institutions of monarchy with democracy in the best practical citystate. Thus, Plato comes to realize the insurmountable difficulties of his ideal political thought, preferring a more practical political philosophy instead.
Author(s): Brooks T
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: International Journal of Philosophical Studies
Year: 2006
Volume: 14
Issue: 1
Pages: 51-77
ISSN (print): 0967-2559
ISSN (electronic): 1466-4542
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09672550500445137
DOI: 10.1080/09672550500445137
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
