Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Reliability of the new freezing of gait questionnaire: Agreement between patients with Parkinson's disease and their carers

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Lynn RochesterORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Freezing of gait (FOG) is difficult to measure due to its unpredictable occurrence. This study investigated: (1) whether the new freezing of gait questionnaire (NFOG-Q) is a reliable measure of freezing by comparing patients’ ratings with those of carers’ and (2) whether adding a video improved its reliability. Non-demented people with Parkinson's disease (PD) (N = 102) and their carers of similar age and cognitive status were recruited from movement disorders clinics in three countries. The NFOG-Q was administered to carers and patients independently before and after watching a video showing several examples of FOG. Patients had very high agreement between their pre- and post-video detection of FOG (Kappa = 0.91). However, this was less than in carers (Kappa = 0.79). The video had a significant influence (p = 0.01) on the rating of FOG severity (duration) but not on the estimation of its functional impact. Post-video freezing severity scores in the 69 freezers showed high agreement with carers’ scores (ICC = 0.78 [0.65;0.87]). We conclude that the NFOG-Q is a reliable tool to detect and evaluate the impact and severity of FOG. Adding a video does not add to the sensitivity and specificity of FOG detection but influences the estimation of FOG severity.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Nieuwboer A, Rochester L, Herman T, Vandeberghe W, Ehab Emil G, Thomaes T, Giladi N

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Gait & Posture

Year: 2009

Volume: 30

Issue: 4

Pages: 459-463

ISSN (print): 0966-6362

ISSN (electronic): 1879-2219

Publisher: Elsevier BV

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.108

DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.07.108


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share