Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Kamara Scott, Emerita Professor Sandra Edwards
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The aims of this study were to compare three different methods to assess fear of humans in sows, and identify the most practical and reliable method for on-farm welfare assessment. Fifty-five crossbred sows (Landrace x Large White x Duroc) of different parities and stages of pregnancy were each subjected to three tests-Test 0: response of free moving sows to a stationary observer in an open field test; Test S: response of sows in stalls to approaching hand contact; Test G: response of free moving sows in groups to approach by an observer. Each test was repeated after a period of no more than one week and sows behavioural responses were scored according to pre-determined scales of approach-withdrawal behaviour. Although previously validated in another study, Test 0 showed poor repeatability (r(s) = 0.153, P > 0.05), whereas repeatability was good for both Test S (r(s) = 0.777, P 0.05). Rank correlations showed a weak but significant relationship between Test 0 and Test S (r(s) = 0.270, P 0.05). There were no significant effects of parity or stage of pregnancy on fear responses in any of the three tests. Since they are practical, repeatable and measure the same level of underlying fear of humans in sows, we recommend Test S and Test G for on-farm welfare assessment in different housing systems. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Author(s): Scott K, Laws DM, Courboulay V, Meunier-Salaun MC, Edwards SA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Year: 2009
Volume: 118
Issue: 1-2
Pages: 36-41
ISSN (print): 0168-1591
ISSN (electronic): 1872-9045
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.004
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.02.004
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
