Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Darren FlynnORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The evaluation and monitoring of interventions that are designed to alleviate psychosocial stress rely largely on subjective assessments of coping as primary outcome measures. The pros and cons of different response formats used to measure coping variables are unexplored; yet arguably, response format is a very important methodological issue for the clinical application and evaluation of psychosocial interventions. This study compared the levels of functional coping and transactional coping patterns assessed with multi-item 7-point Likert Scales (LS) and 65mm Visual Analogue Scales (VAS), within the framework of the Functional Dimensions of Coping (FDC) Scale developed by Ferguson and Cox, 1997. LS yielded significantly higher levels of functional coping for all four subscales, and captured a wider range of transactional coping patterns for the approach, emotion, and avoidance coping functions, than VAS. The authors recommend the use of LS for baseline assessments of transactionally defined coping function within the FDC framework.
Author(s): Flynn D, van Schaik P, van Wersch A
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: The European Journal of Psychological Assessment
ISSN (print): 1015-5759
ISSN (electronic): 2151-2426
Publisher: Hogrefe Publishing Corp.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric