Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Tim Kirk
It is a truth universally acknowledged that nowhere is the past a greater burden on the present than in the historian's own area of interest. In Austria, in 2008, the past seemed to be more than usually present. From the outset, it was declared a year of multiple anniversaries; and the years 1848, 1918, 1968, and above all 1938 were recalled in conferences and books and in public discussion in the media. And yet some aspects of the past were curiously absent: Austrian democracy, we learned from an events listings handout distributed at Vienna airport, was established in 1918—only to be extinguished by the Nazis in 1938. In this context, Oliver Rathkolb's finding (presented at a conference on democracy held at the Vienna Museum in March), that forty percent of Austrians do not even know who Engelbert Dollfuss was, is hardly surprising. This is not to say that there is no engagement with the thornier questions of Austria's past—in the University's Institut für Zeitgeschichte, there is talk of little else—but that there is now, as delegates at the same conference agreed, something of a gulf between the general public's understanding of the past and that of academic historians and some sections of the press.
Author(s): Kirk T
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Austrian History Yearbook
Year: 2009
Volume: 40
Pages: 288-299
Date deposited: 15/03/2011
ISSN (print): 0067-2378
ISSN (electronic): 1558-5255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0067237809000216
DOI: 10.1017/S0067237809000216
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
