Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr James Armstrong
The term ‘safety critical’ applies to a wide range of technologies, from car braking systems, through trains and their signalling systems, to advanced air and space technology, both civil and military. It is a rather sophisticated euphemism for ‘dangerous’; and like the word ‘safe’, it suggests the existence of some spectral but inherent property beneficial to human health that could be lost under certain conditions, but does not have to be. How far can the discourse about safety be trusted? And why are debates about risk sometimes so heated? In this paper it is proposed that literary theory, particularly work on ‘deconstruction’ by philosopher Jacques Derrida, can shed some light on these questions. Unsurprisingly, deconstruction cannot say much to safety engineers about the technicalities of system building. But then again questions about whether and why we continue to build and rely upon safety critical technologies are not simply technical; the language used in them is almost always politically charged.
Author(s): Armstrong JM
Publication type: Report
Publication status: Published
Series Title: School of Computing Science Technical Report Series
Year: 2004
Pages: 13
Print publication date: 01/03/2004
Source Publication Date: March 2004
Report Number: 831
Institution: School of Computing Science, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
Place Published: Newcastle upon Tyne
URL: http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/publications/trs/papers/831.pdf
