Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Paul Baker, Professor Paul Gregg
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
A postal questionnaire was sent to 10 000 patients more than one year after their total knee replacement (TKR). They were assessed using the Oxford knee score and were asked whether they were satisfied, unsure or unsatisfied with their TKR. The response rate was 87.4% (8231 of 9417 eligible questionnaires) and a total of 81.8% (6625 of 8095) of patients were satisfied. Multivariable regression modelling showed that patients with higher scores relating to the pain and function elements of the Oxford knee score had a lower level of satisfaction (p < 0.001), and that ongoing pain was a stronger predictor of this. Female gender and a primary diagnosis of osteoarthritis were found to be predictors of lower levels of patient satisfaction. Differences in the rate of satisfaction were also observed in relation to age, the American Society of Anesthesiologists grade and the type of prosthesis. This study has provided data on the Oxford knee score and the expected levels of satisfaction at one year after TKR. The results should act as a benchmark of practice in the United Kingdom and provide a baseline for peer comparison between institutions.
Author(s): Baker PN, Van Der Meulen J, Lewsey J, Gregg PJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (British Volume)
Year: 2007
Volume: 89-B
Issue: 7
Pages: 893-900
ISSN (print): 0301-620X
ISSN (electronic): 2044-5377
Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.19091
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
