ePrints

In defence of business history: A reply to Taylor, Bell and Cooke

Lookup NU author(s): Professor John Wilson

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.

Abstract

The article offers a defence of business history and responds to the suggestion from Taylor et al. (2009) that it should engage more with reflexive historiography and in particular with the work of the continental philosopher, Paul Ricoeur. We argue that such an engagement would not be helpful to business history in general, and would not address the specific issue of business history’s isolation from management and organisation studies.To explain why, the article uses examples from literatures in business history, general history and historiography. It concludes that although business history’s achievements are significant, they are predominantly empirical and to engage more with management and organization studies, it is necessary for business history to use a wider range of perspectives to become more theoretically informed.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Toms S, Wilson JF

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Management & Organisational History

Year: 2010

Volume: 5

Issue: 1

Pages: 109-120

Print publication date: 01/02/2010

ISSN (print): 1744-9359

ISSN (electronic): 1744-9367

Publisher: Sage

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1744935909353919

DOI: 10.1177/1744935909353919

Altmetrics

Share