Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Andrew Cant
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Purpose of review It is 20 years since the 10 Warning Signs of primary immunodeficiency (PID) were first published and with over 180 PIDs now identified it is timely to evaluate their effectiveness, given the broadening clinical spectrum of PID. Recent findings Two recent studies have sought to define the features that best identify patients with PID and compare these with the 10 Warning Signs. They suggest the 10 Warning Signs discriminate poorly between those with and without PID, and that other features identify about one-third of patients with PID in whom none of the 10 Warning Signs was present. Recent literature describes the diverse presenting features that may assist in more accurately identifying those with PID. Summary Further development and refinement of early warning signs in light of the growing knowledge of how PIDs manifest clinically may allow relatively simple yet effective guidelines targeted at different groups to better detect PID.
Author(s): O'Sullivan MD, Cant AJ
Publication type: Review
Publication status: Published
Journal: Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology
Year: 2012
Volume: 12
Issue: 6
Pages: 588-594
Print publication date: 01/12/2012
ISSN (print): 1528-4050
ISSN (electronic): 1473-6322
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283591534
DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e3283591534