Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Donald Grubin
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
The belief that polygraph evidence is inadmissible in English criminal proceedings has as its basis a variety of common law exclusionary evidential rules. In reality, this view is backed up by very little English case law. Further, several of the relevant common law rules have been mod-ified by statute, have become obsolescent or, dependent upon circumstances, may not always exclude polygraph. Moreover, it is necessary to distinguish expert evidence based on the pass–fail results of a polygraph examination (which, if admissible at all, would appear only to be admissible in very limited circumstances) from evidence of statements made by the subject of the polygraph examination (which may be admissible in a wider variety of circumstances).
Author(s): Stockdale M, Grubin D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Criminal Law
Year: 2012
Volume: 76
Issue: 3
Pages: 232-253
Print publication date: 01/06/2012
ISSN (print): 0022-0183
ISSN (electronic): 1740-5580
Publisher: Vathek Publishing
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1350/jcla.2012.76.3.771
DOI: 10.1350/jcla.2012.76.3.771
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric