Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Development and validation of a nurse-assessed patient comfort score for colonoscopy

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Matthew Rutter, Dr Tom Lee, Professor Colin ReesORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Background: Comfort during colonoscopy is a critical component of safety and quality. Objective: To develop and validate the Nurse-Assessed Patient Comfort Score (NAPCOMS). Design: Prospective scale validation. Setting: Colorectal cancer screening centers in the United Kingdom and Canada. Patients: A total of 300 consecutive patients undergoing colonoscopy at participating colorectal cancer screening centers. Intervention: The NAPCOMS was developed by using a modified Delphi process. During colonosco`py, two endoscopy room nurses independently observed and rated patient comfort and tolerability by using NAPCOMS. In addition, endoscopists reported global comfort scores and patients' reported global comfort by using visual 4-point Likert and National Health Service-United Kingdom Global Rating Scales. Main Outcome Measurements: Reliability and validity of NAPCOMS was measured by using intraclass correlations (ICC) between nurse ratings of colonoscopies and between NAPCOMS, endoscopist ratings, and patient ratings of global comfort. Results: The ICC for the overall NAPCOMS was 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80-0.87). There was high agreement between the NAPCOMS and endoscopist ratings of comfort (ICC = 0.77; 95% CI, 0.72-0.81), moderate agreement between the NAPCOMS and patient ratings (ICC = 0.61; 95% CI, 0.53-0.67), and moderate agreement between the endoscopist and patient ratings (ICC = 0.52; 95% CI, 0.43-0.60). Limitations: NAPCOMS was validated in outpatients who received colonoscopy with minimal to moderate sedation as part of a screening and surveillance program, so performance among inpatients or those requiring deep sedation was not tested. Conclusion: NAPCOMS is a reliable and valid tool for assessing patient comfort in the setting of outpatient colonoscopy performed with minimal to moderate sedation. (Gastrointest Endosc 2013; 77: 255-61.)


Publication metadata

Author(s): Rostom A, Ross ED, Dube C, Rutter MD, Lee T, Valori R, Bridges RJ, Pontifex D, Webbink V, Rees C, Brown C, Whetter DH, Kelsey SG, Hilsden RJ

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Year: 2013

Volume: 77

Issue: 2

Pages: 255-261

Print publication date: 01/02/2013

ISSN (print): 0016-5107

ISSN (electronic): 1097-6779

Publisher: Mosby, Inc.

URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003

DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.10.003


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share