Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Zia Shaikh, Dr Andrew Zealand, Dr Jan DolfingORCiD, Dr Cesar Mota, Professor David GrahamORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Four trickling biofilter designs were assessed as low-energy alternatives to aerobic activated sludge (AS) for the treatment of personal care product industry wastes. The designs included partially submerged packed-media and sponge reactors with and without active aeration. Partial submergence was used to reduce active aeration needs. Simulated colourant wastes (up to COD=12,480mg/L, TN=128mg/L) were treated for 201days, including wastes with elevated oxidant levels. COD and TN removal efficiencies were always >79% and >30% (even without aeration). However, aerated sponge reactors consistently had the highest removal efficiencies, especially for TN (∼60%), and were most tolerant of elevated oxidants. This study shows sponge biofilters have great potential for treating colourant wastes because they achieve high treatment efficiencies and reduce energy use by >40% relative to AS systems.
Author(s): Ahammad SZ, Zealand A, Dolfing J, Mota C, Armstrong DV, Graham DW
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Bioresource Technology
Year: 2013
Volume: 129
Pages: 634-638
Print publication date: 20/12/2012
ISSN (print): 0960-8524
ISSN (electronic): 1873-2976
Publisher: Elsevier BV
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.083
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.083
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric