Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Peter Stone OBE
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Led by the cultural heritage community, the world reacted in horror and outrage as it became clear that the Iraq Museum had been looted in 2003. Concern only increased as the full extent of looting of archaeological sites in Iraq became clear. It is difficult not to agree with Colin Renfrew when he argues the events reveal “a tale…of gut-wrenching negligence and astonishing incompetence by American (and British) politicians and military leaders, and of their disastrous outcome”. Archaeologists had tried to brief Coalition forces as to the remarkable cultural heritage with which they would come into contact in Iraq. Some, myself included, had at least been listened to although our efforts can now be seen to have failed. Some archaeologists suggest that, by briefing the military, we abdicated our ethical position and became ‘embedded archaeologists’, lending legitimacy to the war through our well-meaning, but misguided, efforts. Is the cultural heritage community without blame? In the latter half of the Twentieth Century, we failed to maintain the close relationship with the military developed during the Second World War and thus lost our ability to influence the military and their political leaders. Should we have tried? And what should we do now, in anticipation of the next conflict?
Author(s): Stone PG
Editor(s): Matthews, R., Curtis, J.
Publication type: Book Chapter
Publication status: Published
Book Title: 7th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East
Publisher: Harrassowitz Verlag
Place Published: Wiesbaden
Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item