Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Danny MacKinnonORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In recent years, the dominant political-economic approach to scale has been subject to critique from poststructuralist perspectives. In this paper, I argue that the charge of ‘reification’ has been accepted too readily, masking areas of conceptual overlap between political-economic and poststructural approaches, particularly in terms of their shared concern with the construction of scale. On this basis, I propose to replace the established concept of ‘the politics of scale’ with ‘scalar politics’, arguing that it is often not scale per se that is the prime object of contention, but rather specific processes and institutionalized practices that are themselves differentially scaled.
Author(s): MacKinnon D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Progress in Human Geography
Print publication date: 12/07/2010
ISSN (print): 0309-1325
ISSN (electronic): 1477-0288
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric