Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Nathaniel ColemanORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In what follows, I offer a meditation on the political gap that characterizes most contemporary architectural work, described by either its designers or critics as socially engaged, activist, or utopian. In particular, my interest here lies with purportedly utopian work, described as such from either within architecture or from the outside. Absent from almost all contemporary examples of putatively utopian architecture is the commitment to transformation (individual, social, and political) that is central to Utopias vocation (as method, and as desire).
Author(s): Coleman N
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Boundaries International Architectural Magazine
Year: 2013
Issue: 8
Pages: 4-11
Print publication date: 01/04/2013
ISSN (print): 2239-0332
ISSN (electronic): 2252-3456
Publisher: Luca Sampò
URL: http://www.boundaries.it/global/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=208&Itemid=231&lang=en
