Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Daithi Mac Sithigh
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This article aims to map the position of academic legal research, using a distinction between “law as a practical discipline”, “law as humanities” and “law as social sciences” as a conceptual framework. Having explained this framework, we address both the “macro” and “micro” level of legal research in the UK. For this purpose, we have collected information on the position of all law schools within the structure of their respective universities. We also introduce “ternary plots” as a new way of explaining individual research preferences. Our general result is that all three categories play a role within the context of UK legal academia, though the relationship between the “macro” and the “micro” level is not always straight-forward. We also provide comparisons with the US and Germany and show that in all three countries law as an academic tradition has been constantly evolving, raising questions such as whether the UK could or should move further to a social science model already dominant in the US.
Author(s): Siems M, Mac Síthigh D
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Cambridge Law Journal
Year: 2012
Volume: 71
Issue: 3
Pages: 651-676
Print publication date: 27/11/2012
ISSN (print): 0008-1973
ISSN (electronic): 1469-2139
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000852
DOI: 10.1017/S0008197312000852
Notes: http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/8255772/mapping_legal_research_final.pdf
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric