Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Yincent TseORCiD, Dr Idse Herrema, Dr Milos Ognjanovic, Dr Nadeem Moghal, Dr Malcolm Coulthard
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Renal biopsies are usually performed in the prone position, often under general anaesthesia. Because it is theoretically and pragmatically safer to anaesthetise children in the lateral rather than the prone position, we compared the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided renal biopsy in these two positions.In our department, physician preference dictates positioning during renal biopsy. We retrospectively audited the case notes and biopsy quality of 50 consecutive biopsies performed in each position, reviewing a total of 44 lateral and 47 prone position biopsies. Patient characteristics were similar for age and sex. Endotracheal intubation was carried out in all patients in the prone position and 18 % of patients in the lateral position. All patients were successfully biopsied, and the diagnostic yield and complications were similar in both groups.Renal biopsy under general anaesthesia is as successful in the lateral position as when it is performed prone. Therefore, the lateral position should be considered as an alternative because it reduces the anaesthetic risk.
Author(s): Tse Y, Yadav P, Herrema I, Ognjanovic M, Moghal N, Coulthard MG
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Pediatric Nephrology
Year: 2013
Volume: 28
Issue: 4
Pages: 671-673
Print publication date: 01/04/2013
Online publication date: 28/12/2012
ISSN (print): 0931-041X
ISSN (electronic): 1432-198X
Publisher: Springer
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00467-012-2388-1
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-012-2388-1
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric