Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The welfare implications of large litter size in the domestic pig II: management factors

Lookup NU author(s): Emma Baxter, Emerita Professor Sandra Edwards


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Increasing litter size has long been a goal of pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) breeders and producers in many countries. Whilst this has economic and environmental benefits for the pig industry, there are also implications for pig welfare. Certain management interventions are used when litter size routinely exceeds the ability of individual sows to successfully rear all the piglets (ie viable piglets outnumber functional teats). Such interventions include: tooth reduction; split suckling; cross-fostering; use of nurse sow systems and early weaning, including split weaning; and use of artificial rearing systems. These practices raise welfare questions for both the piglets and sow and are described and discussed in this review. In addition, possible management approaches which might mitigate health and welfare issues associated with large litters are identified. These include early intervention to provide increased care for vulnerable neonates and improvements to farrowing accommodation to mitigate negative effects, particularly for nurse sows. An important concept is that management at all stages of the reproductive cycle, not simply in the farrowing accommodation, can impact on piglet outcomes. For example, poor stockhandling at earlier stages of the reproductive cycle can create fearful animals with increased likelihood of showing poor maternal behaviour. Benefits of good sow and litter management, including positive human-animal relationships, are discussed. Such practices apply to all production situations, not just those involving large litters. However, given that interventions for large litters involve increased handling of piglets and increased interaction with sows, there are likely to be even greater benefits for management of hyper-prolific herds.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Baxter EM, Rutherford KMD, D'Eath RB, Arnott G, Turner SP, Sandoe P, Moustsen VA, Thorup F, Edwards SA, Lawrence AB

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Animal Welfare

Year: 2013

Volume: 22

Issue: 2

Pages: 219-238

Print publication date: 01/05/2013

ISSN (print): 0962-7286

Publisher: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare


DOI: 10.7120/09627286.22.2.219


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric