Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

From four to zero? The social mechanisms of symbolic domination in the UK accounting field

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Mairi Maclean


Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Corporate failures and financial crises periodically lead to speculation and critique of the Big Four in the UK. Wide-reaching regulatory changes and reforms have emerged as a consequence, yet the overall dominance of the large accounting firms remains an immutable truth. This paper explores the dominance of the Big Four drawing on Bourdieu's rich system of thought, and in particular the role of symbolic productions, and how symbolic power and symbolic violence are deployed to secure the social integration of an arbitrary order. We document the social mechanisms of symbolic domination that secure the Big Four's position in the social structure of professional accounting firms. We identify a circular system of double-structured domination, where three mechanisms of euphemised discourse, rites of institution and socialisation normalise symbolic systems and disabling constraints for smaller firms. In addition to interviewing informants working in the field, this paper examines recent political challenges that have placed the role of the Big Four and their domination under increasing scrutiny. These challenges bring into focus issues of recognition and resistance to symbolic modes of domination, and we contemplate the impact of such discourses on the dynamics of the UK accounting field, and the Big Four's continued influence.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Stringfellow L, McMeeking K, Maclean M

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Critical Perspectives on Accounting

Year: 2015

Volume: 27

Pages: 86-100

Print publication date: 01/03/2015

Online publication date: 17/06/2014

Acceptance date: 04/06/2014

ISSN (print): 1045-2354

ISSN (electronic): 1095-9955

Publisher: Elsevier


DOI: 10.1016/


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric