Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Neil Adrian Powe
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Previous research suggests a common mismatch between visual expectations and development outcomes. Is this merely a problem of poor translation of expert knowledge? Or does it also relate more broadly to the use of visualisations within practice? This paper explores the potential for virtual reality (VR) to alleviate such concerns within the formal process of landscape and visual impact assessment (LVIA). Drawing from literature on science/policy interactions, VR can be regarded as an object potentially facilitating “boundary work” between various actors and hopefully helping to better match visual expectations to development outcomes. Viewed through this lens, VR may enhance the translation of expert knowledge into policy arenas and have agency to encourage improved communication and negotiation between the various actors involved. The views of landscape practitioners suggest VR has potential to facilitate such improved “boundary work”, but only if there is a focus on credibility and legitimacy. Such a focus may limit the salience of VR to LVIA. Despite the challenges of implementation, it is argued enhancing “boundary work” should be a key focus within future visualisation research.
Author(s): An K, Powe NA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning
Year: 2015
Volume: 17
Issue: 5
Pages: 673-690
Print publication date: 01/10/2015
Online publication date: 24/02/2015
Acceptance date: 01/01/1900
ISSN (print): 1523-908X
ISSN (electronic): 1522-7200
Publisher: Routledge
URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1012757
DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1012757
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric