Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Clare McGlynn,
Professor Ian Ward
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
John Stuart Mill dominates contemporary pornography debates where he is routinely invoked as an authoritative defence against regulation. This article, by contrast, argues that a broader understanding of Mill's ethical liberalism, his utilitarianism, and his feminism casts doubt over such an assumption. New insights into Mill's approach to sex, sexual activity, and the regulation of prostitution reveal an altogether more nuanced and activist approach. We conclude that John Stuart Mill would almost certainly have accepted certain forms of pornography regulation and, in this light, we argue that Mill can provide the foundation for new, liberal justifications of some forms of pornography regulation.
Author(s): McGlynn C, Ward I
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Law and Society
Print publication date: 01/12/2014
Online publication date: 27/11/2014
ISSN (print): 0263-323X
ISSN (electronic): 1467-6478
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric