Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Zhenhong Li
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Global DEMs are widely used in the study of natural hazards and environmental change on a global scale. This paper focuses on validation of the most widely used and newly released global DEMs (SRTM v4.1, NASA SRTM v3, SRTMX and ASTER GDEM v2) in China. We use independent and precise ground GPS observations to assess their absolute accuracies. The SRTMX DEM performs best with a height RMSE of 9.7 m, whilst the RMSE of the ASTER GDEM2 is slightly better than that of the SRTM v4.1, and SRTM v3 in these regions have the largest RMSE of 16.6 m. However, systematic negative bias still exists in all the global DEMs. Results of the raster-based comparisons between the DEMs are dependent on the knowledge of vegetation type, density and structure to a large extent as well as accurate co-registration. Slope comparisons exhibit a hierarchical slope difference of about 2 degree between the SRTMX DEM, ASTER GDEM2 and SRTM C-band DEM (v4.1 and v3). This paper provides the first direct evidence and measurement of the product quality of SRTMX and SRTM v3 DEM in China and also offers a benchmark for the future evaluation of following global DEM products.
Author(s): Li P, Li Z, Muller J-P, Shi C, Liu J
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Survey Review
Online publication date: 30/03/2016
Acceptance date: 18/05/2015
ISSN (print): 0039-6265
ISSN (electronic): 1752-2706
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric