Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Treating childhood intermittent distance exotropia: a qualitative study of decision making

Lookup NU author(s): Jan Lecouturier, Michael Clarke, Dr Gail Errington, Dr Nina Hallowell, Professor Madeleine Murtagh, Emeritus Professor Richard Thomson



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Background: Engaging patients (parents/families) in treatment decisions is increasingly recognised as important and beneficial. Yet where the evidence base for treatment options is limited, as with intermittent distance exotropia (X(T)), this presents a challenge for families and clinicians. The purpose of this study was to explore how decisions are made in the management and treatment of X(T) and what can be done to support decision-making for clinicians, parents and children.Methods: This was a qualitative study using face to face interviews with consultant ophthalmologists and orthoptists, and parents of children with X(T). Interview data were analysed using the constant comparative method.Results: The drivers for clinicians in treatment decision-making for X(T) were the proportion of time the strabismus is manifest and parents' views. For parents, decisions were influenced by: fear of bullying and, to a lesser degree, concerns around the impact of the strabismus on their child's vision. Uncertainty around the effectiveness of treatment options caused difficulties for some clinicians when communicating with parents. Parental understanding of the nature of X(T) and rationale for treatment often differed from that of the clinicians, and this affected their involvement in decision-making. Though there were good examples of shared decision-making and parent and child engagement some parents said the process felt rushed and they felt excluded. Parents reported that clinicians provided sufficient information in consultations but they had difficulties in retaining verbal information to convey to other family members.Conclusions: Overall parents were happy with the care their child received but there is scope for better parent and (where appropriate) child engagement in decision-making. There was an expressed need for written information about X(T) to reinforce what was given verbally in consultations and to share with other family members. Access could be via the hospital website, along with videos or blogs from parents and children who have undergone the various management options. A method of assisting clinicians to explain the treatment options, together with the uncertainties, in a clear and concise way could be of particular benefit to orthoptists who have the most regular contact with parents and children, and are more likely to suggest conservative treatments such as occlusion and minus lenses.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Lecouturier J, Clarke MP, Errington G, Hallowell N, Murtagh MJ, Thomson R

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: BMC Opthalmology

Year: 2015

Volume: 15

Online publication date: 22/08/2015

Acceptance date: 22/07/2015

Date deposited: 25/11/2015

ISSN (print): 1471-2415

Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd


DOI: 10.1186/s12886-015-0087-y

PubMed id: 26296859


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funder referenceFunder name
National Institute for Health Research, Research for Patient Benefit Programme
PB-PG-1207-14160National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) under its Research for Patient Benefit (RfPB) Programme