Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Kevin Wilson
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper demonstrates that wave height forecasters chosen on statistical quality metrics result in sub-optimal decision support for offshore wind farm maintenance. Offshore access is constrained by wave height, but the majority of approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of a wave height forecaster utilize overall accuracy or error rates. This paper introduces a new metric more appropriate to the wind industry, which considers the economic impact of an incorrect forecast above or below critical wave height boundaries. The paper describes a process for constructing a value criterion where the implications between forecasting error and economic consequences are explicated in terms of opportunity costs and realized maintenance costs. A comparison between nine forecasting techniques for modeling and predicting wave heights based on historical data, including an ensemble aggregator, is described demonstrating that the performance ranking of forecasters is sensitive to the evaluation criteria. The results highlight the importance of appropriate metrics for wave height prediction specific to the wind industry and the limitations of current models that minimize a metric that does not support decision-making. With improved ability to forecast weather windows, maintenance scheduling is subject to less uncertainty, hence reducing costs related to vessel dispatch, and lost energy because of downtime.
Author(s): Catterson VM, McMillan D, Dinwoodie I, Revie M, Quigley J, Wilson KJ
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Wind Energy
Print publication date: 01/02/2016
Online publication date: 06/01/2015
Acceptance date: 22/11/2014
Date deposited: 22/09/2015
ISSN (print): 1095-4244
ISSN (electronic): 1099-1824
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric