Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Stephen Elstub
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
As the theory of deliberative democracy becomes increasingly popular, it also becomes an increasingly diverse and flexible theory. This diversity could be a double edged sword; on the one hand this dexterity enables deliberative democracy to become more engrossing, comprehensive and relevant to more and more democratic, philosophical and practical issues. On the other hand deliberative democracy can start to be everything to everyone and lose an essence and core set of ideas. The paper highlights the diversity deliberative democracy is gaining in areas of justification, on the nature of public reason and over mechanisms for institutionalisation. Although the paper accepts that deliberative democracy is necessarily an ‘essentially contested concept’ and ‘morphological’ it also attempts to offer a broad and loose core to provide some boundaries to interpretations, to prevent the theory becoming meaningless though diversity.
Author(s): Elstub S
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Contemporary Politics
Print publication date: 01/09/2006
Online publication date: 04/12/2010
Date deposited: 02/03/2016
ISSN (print): 1356-9775
ISSN (electronic): 1469-3631
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric