Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Colin MurrayORCiD,
Dr Lida Pitsillidou,
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
In the United States (US) student-run law reviews have long offered students the opportunity to develop their skills as editors and members of a publication team and to engage with new legal research. With law ordinarily taught as a three-year postgraduate degree, these reviews are normally staffed by a postgraduate editorial team. Similar efforts in the United Kingdom (UK) have largely been short-lived. Some venerable academic journals, such as the Cambridge Law Journal, started their lives as student-centred projects, but academics soon assumed control of the process due to the variable quality of undergraduate editing. This false start proved difficult to recover from, but a spate newly-founded student law reviews in the last decade suggests that these publications have increasing traction in UK legal education. This article evaluates the challenges and potential benefits of these efforts to translate US practice into UK law schools in light of the experience of creating and maintaining the North East Law Review, a student-led periodical based at Newcastle University which publishes student-generated content based on high-quality coursework submissions. This process potentially enhances the assessment process, with the student editorial team preparing essays for publication and student authors reengaging with their work in light of feedback. Publishing such essays furthermore allows all students to benchmark their own work against excellent coursework performance.
Author(s): Murray CRG, Pitsillidou L, Caine C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: The Law Teacher
Online publication date: 17/03/2016
Acceptance date: 25/01/2016
Date deposited: 27/04/2016
ISSN (print): 0306-9400
ISSN (electronic): 1943-0353
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric