Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr David Bell
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
This article pays “subversive fidelity” to utopia by rethinking what might be meant by the “good,” “no,” and “place” and how they might be brought together in an ambiguous but productive consistency. Specifically, it does this by drawing on Deleuze’s reading of Spinoza’s ethics, Sara Ahmed’s concept of the “affect alien,” and Doreen Massey’s understanding of place. It then applies and develops the theoretical approach through a reading of Anarres, as described in Ursula K. Le Guin’s novel The Dispossessed. While the theory of utopia produced is intended normatively, the article also shows how it can be used as a methodology for the reading of specific places, as well as how it can be used alongside other utopian studies methods to read utopian texts.
Author(s): Bell DM
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Utopian Studies
Year: 2016
Volume: 27
Issue: 2
Pages: 129-151
Print publication date: 27/06/2016
Online publication date: 21/06/2016
Acceptance date: 13/01/2016
Date deposited: 08/11/2016
ISSN (print): 1045-991X
ISSN (electronic): 2154-9648
Publisher: Pennsylvania State University Press
URL: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/625712