Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Selection and ranking of the main beam geometry of a freight wagon for lightweighting

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Emmanuel Matsika, Conor O'Neill, Marzio Grasso



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).


The traditional freight wagons employ I-beam sections as the main load-bearing structures. The primary loads they carry are vertical (from loading units) and axial (from train traction and buffers). Ease of manufacturing has played an important role in the selection of the I-beam for this role. However, with lightweighting increasingly becoming an important design objective, an evaluation needs to be done to assess if there are other existing or new section profiles (geometry) that would carry the same operational loads but are lighter. This paper presents an evaluation of 24 section profiles for their ability to take the operational loads of freight wagons. The profiles are divided into two categories, namely ‘conventional – made by wagon manufacturers (including the I-beam)’ and ‘pre-fabricated’ sections. For ranking purposes, the primary design objectives or key performance indicators were bending stress, associated deflection and buckling load.Subsequently, this was treated as a multi-criteria decision-making process. The loading conditions were applied as prescribed by the EU standard EN 12663-2. To carry out structural analysis, finite element analysis was implemented using ANSYS software. To determine the validity of the finite element analysis results, correlation analysis was done with respect to beam theory. Parameters considered were: maximum stress, deflection, second moment of area, thickness, bending stiffness and flexural rigidity. The paper discusses the impreciseness related to the use of beam theory since the local stiffness of the beam is neglected leading to an inaccurate estimation of the buckling load and the vertical displacement.Even more complicated can be the estimation of the maximum stress to be used for comparison when features such as spot welds are present. The nominal stress values computed by means of Navier equation lead to an inaccurate value of the stress since it neglects the variations in the local stiffness, which can lead to an increase in the bending stress values. The main objective of the paper is the applicability of particular section profiles to the railway field with the aim of lightweighting the main structure. Sections commonly adopted in civil applications have also been investigated to understand the stiffness and strength under railway service loads. The common approach reported in literature so far makes use either of the beam theory or topological finite element approach to determine the optimised shape under the action of the simplified loading conditions. Although the previous approaches seem to be more general, the assumptions made affect the optimisation process since the stress state differs from that attained under the actual service load in the real structure. In this paper, the use of complex shape cross sections and detailed finite element models allows to take account of the real behaviour in terms of stiffness distribution and local stress effects due to manufacturing features like welds. The structural assessment carried out with the detailed models also allows for the proper comparison among the considered sections. Analysis of the results showed that three out of the 24 section profiles have the highest potential to be fitted as the main load-bearing beams for freight wagons, with the pre-fabricated Z-section being the optimum of the three.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Matsika E, ONeill C, Grasso M, De Iorio A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transport

Year: 2018

Volume: 232

Issue: 2

Pages: 495-513

Print publication date: 01/02/2018

Online publication date: 16/11/2016

Acceptance date: 08/10/2016

Date deposited: 23/11/2016

ISSN (print): 0954-4097

Publisher: Sage


DOI: 10.1177/0954409716677075


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric