Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Craig JonesORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
In this paper I draw on interviews conducted with former Israeli military lawyers about their role in lethal targeting operations. I argue that military lawyers and the practice of operational law help to legitimize and extend violence in the Occupied Palestinian Territories. To make the case I focus on Israel's ‘targeted killing policy’ (2000–present) and on the involvement of military lawyers in the planning and execution stages of targeting operations. I offer two contributions to the literature on war and law; first, I extend Derek Gregory's analysis of the ‘kill chain’ by arguing that targeting is increasingly made possible by a ‘technolegal’ process. Second, I add nuance to Eyal Weizman's account of how law extends violence in what he calls the ‘humanitarian present’. I argue that we must attend not only to international humanitarian law and different scales of law but to the simultaneously plural and overlapping legal regimes that govern late modern war. I conclude with a reflection on Judith Butler's Frames of War to think through the ways in which ‘frames of law’ have come to structure our apprehension of targeting and war today.
Author(s): Jones CA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
Year: 2015
Volume: 33
Issue: 4
Pages: 676-696
Print publication date: 01/08/2015
Online publication date: 14/08/2015
Acceptance date: 01/01/1900
ISSN (print): 0263-7758
ISSN (electronic): 1472-3433
Publisher: Sage
URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775815598103
DOI: 10.1177/0263775815598103
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric