Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Improving Staging in Bladder Cancer: The Increasing Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Rachel Pearson

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2016 European Association of Urology. Context: In bladder cancer (BCa) patients, accurate local and regional tumor staging is required when planning treatment. Clinical understaging frequently occurs and leads to undertreatment of the disease, with a negative impact on survival. An improvement in staging accuracy could be attained by advances in imaging. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is currently the best imaging technique for locoregional staging for several malignancies because of its superior soft tissue contrast resolution with the advantage of avoiding exposure to ionizing radiation. Important improvements in MRI technology have led to the introduction of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), which combines anatomic and functional evaluation. Objective: To review the fundamentals of mpMRI in BCa and to provide a contemporary overview of the available data on the role of this emerging imaging technology. Evidence acquisition: A nonsystematic literature search using the Medline and Cochrane Library databases was performed up to March 2016. Additional articles were retrieved by cross-matching references of selected articles. Only articles reporting complete data with regard to image acquisition protocols, locoregional staging, monitoring response to therapy, and detection of locoregional recurrence after primary treatment in BCa patients were selected. Evidence synthesis: Standardization of acquisition and reporting protocols for bladder mpMRI is paramount. Combining anatomic and functional sequences improves the accuracy of local tumor staging compared with conventional imaging alone. Diffusion-weighted imaging may distinguish BCa type and grade. Functional sequences are capable of monitoring response to chemotherapy and radiation therapy. Diffusion-weighted imaging enhanced by lymphotropic nanoparticles showed high accuracy in pelvic lymph node staging compared with conventional cross-sectional imaging. Conclusions: In BCa patients, mpMRI appears a promising tool for accurate locoregional staging, predicting tumor aggressiveness and monitoring response to therapy. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. Patient summary: Better imaging through improved technology will improve outcomes in bladder cancer patients. We reviewed the emerging use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for staging and monitoring bladder cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging appears more accurate than current methods for local and nodal staging and monitoring tumor response to treatment, but requires further investigation. Growing evidence indicates that multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in bladder cancer patients is a more accurate tool than conventional cross-sectional imaging for local and nodal staging, predicting tumor aggressiveness, and monitoring tumor response to chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. Patient summary: Better imaging through improved technology will improve outcomes in bladder cancer patients. We reviewed the emerging use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for staging and monitoring bladder cancer. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging appears more accurate than current methods for local and nodal staging and monitoring tumor response to treatment, but requires further investigation.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Panebianco V, Barchetti F, de Haas RJ, Pearson RA, Kennish SJ, Giannarini G, Catto JWF

Publication type: Review

Publication status: Published

Journal: European Urology Focus

Year: 2016

Volume: 2

Issue: 2

Pages: 113-121

Print publication date: 01/06/2016

Online publication date: 11/05/2016

Acceptance date: 25/04/2016

ISSN (print): 2405-4569

Publisher: Elsevier

URL: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2016.04.010

DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.04.010


Share