Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion in the treatment of severe dry eye disease: A multicenter randomized trial

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Francisco FigueiredoORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© 2016 The Authors. Purpose: The SANSIKA study was conducted to assess the treatment effect of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) eye drops on signs and symptoms of patients with severe dry eye disease (DED). Methods: This was a multicenter, randomized, double-masked, 2-parallel-arm, 6-month phase III study with a 6-month open-label treatment safety follow-up. Patients with severe DED with corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) grade 4 on the modified Oxford scale were randomized to receive once-daily CsA CE (Ikervis®) or its vehicle. Results: A total of 246 patients were randomized. The proportion of patients achieving ≥2 grades improvement in CFS and a 30% improvement in symptoms (Ocular Surface Disease Index [OSDI]) by month 6 was 28.6% with CsA CE vs 23.1% with vehicle (p = 0.326) (primary endpoint). Assessment of corneal damage showed greater improvement with CsA CE over vehicle in mean adjusted CFS change from baseline to month 6 (-1.764 vs -1.418, p = 0.037). There was a reduction in ocular surface inflammation assessed by human leukocyte antigen DR expression in favor of CsA CE at month 6 (p = 0.021). The mean OSDI change from baseline was -13.6 with CsA CE and -14.1 with vehicle at month 6 (p = 0.858). The main adverse event was instillation site pain (29.2% vs 8.9% in the CsA CE and vehicle groups, respectively), and it was mostly mild. Conclusions: CsA CE was well-tolerated and effective in improving corneal damage and ocular surface inflammation and confirmed the positive benefit-risk ratio of this new formulation of CsA for the treatment of severe keratitis in DED.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Leonardi A, Van Setten G, Amrane M, Ismail D, Garrigue J-S, Figueiredo FC, Baudouin C

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: European Journal of Ophthalmology

Year: 2016

Volume: 26

Issue: 4

Pages: 287-296

Print publication date: 01/07/2016

Online publication date: 07/04/2016

Acceptance date: 18/02/2016

Date deposited: 05/05/2017

ISSN (print): 1120-6721

ISSN (electronic): 1724-6016

Publisher: Wichtig Publishing Srl

URL: https://doi.org/10.5301/ejo.5000779

DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000779

PubMed id: 27055414


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share