ePrints

Roman law and the two languages in Justinian's empire

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Simon CorcoranORCiD

Downloads

• Accepted version [.pdf]

Licence

This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Oxford University Press, 2017.

For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.

Abstract

This paper, reflecting Fergus Millar’s work on linguistic and cultural diversity in the Roman empire, surveys the evolving relationship of Latin and Greek as languages for Roman law. Normative texts remained predominantly Latin until the completion of Justinian’s codification (534), even though that was a genuinely bilingual product. However, following the already existing pattern in the Greek east, a vast corpus of Greek materials was then quickly created to teach the codification in the official law schools. Designed to aid engagement with the source-texts, these ended up superseding them. Roman legal Greek, a mixture of Latin terminology plus standardized Greek vocabulary, became stabilized. After 534, new legislation was most often in Greek, necessitating parallel Latin materials to help Latin-speaking students, although sixth-century collections of Novels (“new laws”) were still bilingual. In practice, however, in most of Justinian’s empire, a lawyer (such as Dioscorus of Aphrodito) could function with limited Latin. Soon Roman law would bifurcate into two monolingual traditions, Greek in the east, Latin in the west.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Corcoran S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies

Year: 2017

Volume: 60

Issue: 1

Pages: 96-116

Print publication date: 19/06/2017

Online publication date: 19/06/2017

Acceptance date: 01/03/2017

Date deposited: 22/04/2017

ISSN (print): 0076-0730

ISSN (electronic): 2041-5370

Publisher: Oxford University Press

URL: http://doi.org/10.1111/2041-5370.12049

DOI: 10.1111/2041-5370.12049

Altmetrics

Share