Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Professor Geoff Vigar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
There is widespread criticism of much transport planning practice for relying on particular, ‘technical’, knowledge forms characterized by instrumental, means-end rationality. At the same time politicians are criticized for taking ‘political’ decisions with not enough regard for the outcomes of such technical work. Increasingly attempts to capture the embodied knowledge and values of citizens are also brought into this contested terrain. But which knowledge forms should be significant in making policy and taking decisions; and how might they be brought together in political decision-making which is itself subject to its own rationality? This paper argues that the variety of knowledge forms in everyday transport planning processes should be more transparently articulated. Subsequent reflexion can help enhance the quality of transport planning processes, while such transparency bolsters the democratic legitimacy of the outputs of such processes. Such a more explicitly communicative, trans-disciplinary mode of governance would help to challenge the power of political rationality. This conclusion has implications for how transport planning as a discipline is enacted.
Author(s): Vigar G
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Transport Policy
Year: 2017
Volume: 58
Pages: 39-45
Print publication date: 01/08/2017
Online publication date: 11/05/2017
Acceptance date: 29/04/2017
Date deposited: 30/05/2017
ISSN (print): 0967-070X
ISSN (electronic): 1879-310X
Publisher: Pergamon Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.013
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
