Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Carolyn Pedwell
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
Through illustrating the similarities between embodied practices rooted in different cultural contexts (such as `African' female genital cutting and `Western' cosmetic surgery), feminist theorists seek to reveal the instability of essentialist binaries which distinguish various groups as culturally, ethnically and morally `different'. They also aim to query how the term `culture' is employed differentially on the basis of embodied axes such as race and nation. However, in emphasizing overarching commonalities between practices, feminist cross-cultural comparisons risk collapsing into economies of sameness that elide the complex relations of power through which such practices have been constituted. They can also fix the imagined subjects of these practices in troubling ways. Using the ubiquitous `African' female genital cutting and `Western' cosmetic surgery binary as an example, this article explores the difference it might make to address culturally essentialist constructions of embodied practice with a focus on relationality rather than commonality. As a means to reorient feminist cross-cultural approaches which depend on assertions of similarity or sameness, it argues for the theoretical and pedagogical utility of thinking through relational webs.
Author(s): Pedwell C
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Feminist Theory
ISSN (print): 1464-7001
ISSN (electronic): 1741-2773
Publisher: Sage Publications Ltd.
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric