Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Russell Foster, Professor Nick MegoranORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).
Political geography has an established tradition of engaging with religiously-driven geopolitik. However, despite the remarkable growth in professed atheist beliefs in recent decades and the popular expression of an imagined geopolitical binary between secular/atheist and religious societies, the geopolitics of irreligion have received almost no attention among academic practitioners. This paper outlines the core tenets of ‘New Atheist’ philosophy, before addressing how its key representatives have taken positions on the ‘Global War on Terror.’ In particular, we critically interrogate the works of Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, and the late Christopher Hitchens and identify a belligerent geopolitical imagination which posits a civilizational clash between an existentially-threatened secular, liberal West with responsibility to use extraordinary violence to protect itself and the world from a backwards oriental Islam. The paper concludes with four possible explanations for the paradox that the New Atheist critique of religion for being violent acts itself as a geopolitical incitement to violence. In so doing, we seek to navigate debates about the nature and purpose of critical geopolitical research given that the historical, intellectual and political contexts in which it was formed have changed.
Author(s): Foster Russell, Megoran Nick, Dunn Michael
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Political Geography
Year: 2017
Volume: 60
Pages: 179-189
Print publication date: 01/09/2017
Online publication date: 17/08/2017
Acceptance date: 28/07/2017
Date deposited: 05/09/2017
ISSN (print): 0962-6298
ISSN (electronic): 1873-5096
Publisher: Pergamon Press
URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.07.011
DOI: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2017.07.011
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric
