Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Theorizing Sex Differences in Political Knowledge: Insights from a Twin Study

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sebastian Popa

Downloads


Licence

This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Cambridge University Press, 2014.

For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.


Abstract

It is well established that women and men differ in their psychological orientation to politics (Burns, Schlozman, and Verba 2001; Dolan 2011; Fox and Lawless 2004; Thomas 2012). In addition to willingness to run for office, expressing interest in politics, and political efficacy, men and women tend to differ in reporting their factual knowledge of politics, but how do we explain the gap? This question is not merely important from a measurement standpoint (e.g., Mondak and Anderson 2004) but also has implications for our understanding of gendered political attitudes and behaviors. The gap can be reduced when controlling for a number of factors, but there remains a residual when measuring knowledge with the scale most widely used. This paper aims at providing insight on how we think not only about measuring something like “political knowledge” but also how we theorize gendered political behavior. We present a behavioral genetic analysis of sex differences in political knowledge using a genetically informative twin design to parse out the source of variation in knowledge. We do so predicated on a framework for thinking about gendered patterns in political behavior as well as findings from the existing literature on gender differences in the psychological orientation to politics. We believe our findings give us insight on what is wrong with current and seemingly gender-neutral measures of political knowledge.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Hannagan RJ, Littvay L, Popa SA

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Politics & Gender

Year: 2014

Volume: 10

Issue: 1

Pages: 89-114

Print publication date: 01/03/2014

Online publication date: 27/02/2014

Acceptance date: 01/01/2003

Date deposited: 01/12/2017

ISSN (print): 1743-923X

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1300055X

DOI: 10.1017/S1743923X1300055X


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Actions

Find at Newcastle University icon    Link to this publication


Share