Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

A randomized study of the efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine a cationic emulsion in treatment of moderate to severe dry eye

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Francisco FigueiredoORCiD

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

© 2017 Wichtig Publishing. Purpose: The SICCANOVE study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 0.1% cyclosporine A cationic emulsion (CsA CE) versus vehicle in patients with moderate to severe dry eye disease (DED). Methods: In this multicenter, double-masked, parallel-group, controlled study, patients were randomized (1:1) to receive CsA CE (Ikervis®) or vehicle for 6 months. The co-primary efficacy endpoints at month 6 were mean change from baseline in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS; modified Oxford scale) and in global ocular discomfort (visual analogue scale [VAS]). Results: The mean change in CFS from baseline to month 6 (CsA CE: n = 241; vehicle: n = 248) was significantly greater with CsA CE than with vehicle (-1.05 ± 0.98 and -0.82 ± 0.94, respectively; p = 0.009). Ocular discomfort improved similarly in both groups; however, the percentage of patients with ≥25% improvement in VAS was significantly higher with CsA CE (50.2%) than with vehicle (41.9%; p = 0.048). In a post hoc analysis of patients with severe ocular surface damage (CFS score 4) at baseline (CsA CE: n = 43; vehicle: n = 42), the percentage of patients with improvements of ≥2 grades in CFS score and ≥30% in Ocular Surface Disease Index score was significantly greater with CsA CE (p = 0.003). Treatment compliance and ocular tolerability were satisfactory and as expected for CsA use. Conclusion: Cyclosporine A CE was well-tolerated and effectively improved signs and symptoms in patients with moderate to severe DED over 6 months, especially in patients with severe disease, who are at risk of irreversible corneal damage.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Baudouin C, Figueiredo FC, Messmer EM, Ismail D, Amrane M, Garrigue J-S, Bonini S, Leonardi A

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: European Journal of Ophthalmology

Year: 2017

Volume: 27

Issue: 5

Pages: 520-530

Print publication date: 30/08/2017

Online publication date: 21/03/2017

Acceptance date: 20/02/2017

ISSN (print): 1120-6721

Publisher: Wichtig Publishing Srl

URL: https://doi.org/10.5301/EJO.5000952

DOI: 10.5301/EJO.5000952

PubMed id: 28362054


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share