Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Henri Bertrand,
Emeritus Professor Paul FlecknellORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017. Volatile agents for anaesthesia are widely used for anaesthetizing laboratory primates, and isoflurane is one of the most frequently used agents. Sevoflurane has been shown to offer a more rapid recovery than isoflurane in a number of species, but no comparisons have been made in non-human primates. This study compared the recovery characteristics of isoflurane and sevoflurane in rhesus macaques undergoing experimental neurosurgery. Twelve primates (7 males and 5 females) were randomly allocated to the treatment groups. They were sedated with ketamine (10 mg/kg) and anaesthesia was induced with propofol (usually 8 mg/kg intravenously [IV]). Anaesthesia was maintained with either sevoflurane (SEVO) (2.2 ± 0.4%) or isoflurane (ISO) (1.2 ± 0.2%) and alfentanil (0.2–0.5 µg/kg/min IV) for 332–592 min. Animals were mechanically ventilated. Meloxicam (0.3 mg/kg) and methylprednisolone infusion (5.4 mg/kg/h) were also administered. Time to extubation after cessation of anaesthesia was significantly shorter with sevoflurane (ISO: 7.0 ± 1.8 min; SEVO: 3.6 ± 1.5; *P = 0.005) as was the time to the animal sitting unaided (ISO: 15.7 ± 8.2 min; SEVO: 7.1 ± 1.7 min; *P = 0.004). No significant difference in the quality of recovery following isoflurane or sevoflurane anaesthesia was found. In conclusion, isoflurane and sevoflurane are both suitable volatile agents for the maintenance of general anaesthesia in rhesus macaques undergoing experimental neurosurgical procedures. The two volatile agents presented a similar emergence quality profile, however sevoflurane anaesthesia was associated with a faster recovery, offering the possibility of conducting earlier post-operative neurological assessment.
Author(s): Bertrand HGMJ, Springer S, Burnside W, Sandersen C, Flecknell PA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Laboratory Animals
Print publication date: 01/10/2017
Online publication date: 23/02/2017
Acceptance date: 16/01/2017
ISSN (print): 0023-6772
ISSN (electronic): 1758-1117
Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric