Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Lutz Sauerteig
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
This paper analyses how, prior to the work of Sigmund Freud, an understanding of infant and childhood sexuality emerged during the nineteenth century. Key contributors to the debate were Albert Moll, Max Dessoir and others, as fin-de-siècle artists and writers celebrated a sexualised image of the child. By the beginning of the twentieth century, most paediatricians, sexologists, psychologists, psychiatrists, psychoanalysts and pedagogues agreed that sexuality formed part of a child’s ‘normal’ development. This paper argues that the main disagreements in discourses about childhood sexuality related to different interpretations of children’s sexual experiences. On the one hand stood an explanation that argued for a homology between children’s and adults’ sexual experiences, on the other hand was an understanding that suggested that adults and children had distinct and different experiences. Whereas the homological interpretation was favoured by the majority of commentators, including Moll, Freud, and to some extent also by C.G. Jung, the heterological interpretation was supported by a minority, including childhood psychologist Charlotte Bühler.
Author(s): Sauerteig LDH
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Medical History
Print publication date: 01/06/2012
Online publication date: 01/06/2012
ISSN (print): 0025-7273
ISSN (electronic): 2048-8343
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric