Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

How Do Measures Become Academically Acceptable? A Case Study of the Kinder Lydenberg and Domini (KLD) database

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Laurence Vigneau

Downloads

Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.


Abstract

Although measurement is central to knowledge production, little is known about the process by which a dataset become accepted by academics as an appropriate way of measuring a phenomenon. Relying on actor-network theory and prior studies of the construction of organizational knowledge, and using the Kinder Lydenberg and Domini (KLD) database as a case, we analyze the activities that enabled the adoption of this dataset. Informed by a systematic content analysis of 573 articles referring to KLD and interviews with KLD experts, we develop a process model that explains how datasets become accepted in academia and linked to theoretical concepts. In making visible the practical, symbolic and conceptual work that underlie a dataset adoption in academia, we show how academics can potentially be influenced by practitioners through metrics. Our findings also highlight the importance of reflexivity and mindfulness in the use of datasets.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Gond J-P, Vigneau L

Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)

Publication status: Published

Conference Name: International Association for Business and Society

Year of Conference: 2017

Acceptance date: 01/10/2017

Series Title: Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society


Share