Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

A cost effectiveness analysis of maintenance cognitive stimulation therapy (MCST) for people with dementia: examining the influence of cognitive ability and living arrangements

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Heather BrownORCiD, Professor Luke ValeORCiD, Professor Dame Louise Robinson

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

Objectives: Identify if cost-effectiveness of Maintenance Cognitive Simulation Therapy (MCST) differs by type of living arrangement and cognitive ability of the person with dementia. Findings are used to perform a value of information analysis to inform decisions about future research on the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MCST in people with these characteristics. Methods: Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis applying seemingly unrelated regressions using data from a multicentre RCT of MCST versus treatment as usual in a population which had already received 7 weeks of CST for dementia (ISRCTN: 26286067). The findings from the cost-effectiveness analysis are used to inform a value of information analysis. Results: The results are dependent upon how quality adjusted life years (QALYs) are measured but suggest that MCST might be cost-effective compared to standard treatment for those who live alone and for individuals with higher levels of cognitive functioning. If a further RCT was to be conducted evaluating the cost-effectiveness of MCST for those with higher cognitive functioning and those who lived alone, value of information analysis suggests a total sample of 48 complete cases for both sub-groups would be required for a two-arm trial. The expected net gain of conducting future research for these two population sub-groups is £920 million. Conclusion: Preliminary results suggest that MCST may be most cost-efficient for people with dementia who live alone and/or who have higher cognition. Future research in this area is needed.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Brown H, D'Amico F, Knapp M, Orrell M, Rehill A, Vale L, Robinson L

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Aging & Mental Health

Year: 2019

Volume: 23

Issue: 5

Pages: 602-607

Print publication date: 01/05/2019

Online publication date: 12/03/2018

Acceptance date: 04/02/2018

Date deposited: 05/02/2018

ISSN (print): 1360-7863

ISSN (electronic): 1364-6915

Publisher: Routledge

URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1442410

DOI: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1442410


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funding

Funder referenceFunder name
NIHR
NIHR-RP-011–043

Share