Lookup NU author(s): Dr Sebastian Popa
This is the authors' accepted manuscript of an article that has been published in its final definitive form by Routledge, 2018.
For re-use rights please refer to the publisher's terms and conditions.
© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group The Lisbon Treaty (2009) introduced key institutional changes to increase the relevance of elections to the European Parliament (EP). Among others, major political groups nominated different lead candidates, the so-called Spitzenkandidaten, for the 2014 EP elections. The aim of this article is to investigate how national political parties react to this new institutional setting. Using data from the 2014 Euromanifesto study, the article examines if and under what conditions political parties put emphasis on the Spitzenkandidaten system in their party manifestos and whether they take positive or negative stances when talking about it. The findings reveal that parties put little emphasis on the issue. Moreover, the factors promoting the Spitzenkandidaten system suggest that parties decide strategically upon emphasising that topic or take a positive stance on it if they expect to benefit from this.
Author(s): Braun D, Popa SA
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: West European Politics
Online publication date: 31/01/2018
Acceptance date: 15/12/2017
Date deposited: 16/01/2018
ISSN (print): 0140-2382
ISSN (electronic): 1743-9655
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric