Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Statistical cluster analysis of the british thoracic society severe refractory asthma registry: Clinical outcomes and phenotype stability

Lookup NU author(s): Emeritus Professor Paul BurtonORCiD

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).


Abstract

Background: Severe refractory asthma is a heterogeneous disease. We sought to determine statistical clusters from the British Thoracic Society Severe refractory Asthma Registry and to examine cluster-specific outcomes and stability. Methods: Factor analysis and statistical cluster modelling was undertaken to determine the number of clusters and their membership (N=349). Cluster-specific outcomes were assessed after a median follow-up of 3 years. A classifier was programmed to determine cluster stability and was validated in an independent cohort of new patients recruited to the registry (n=245). Findings: Five clusters were identified. Cluster 1 (34%) were atopic with early onset disease, cluster 2 (21%) were obese with late onset disease, cluster 3 (15%) had the least severe disease, cluster 4 (15%) were the eosinophilic with late onset disease and cluster 5 (15%) had significant fixed airflow obstruction. At follow-up, the proportion of subjects treated with oral corticosteroids increased in all groups with an increase in body mass index. Exacerbation frequency decreased significantly in clusters 1, 2 and 4 and was associated with a significant fall in the peripheral blood eosinophil count in clusters 2 and 4. Stability of cluster membership at follow-up was 52% for the whole group with stability being best in cluster 2 (71%) and worst in cluster 4 (25%). In an independent validation cohort, the classifier identified the same 5 clusters with similar patient distribution and characteristics. Interpretation: Statistical cluster analysis can identify distinct phenotypes with specific outcomes. Cluster membership can be determined using a classifier, but when treatment is optimised, cluster stability is poor. © 2014 Newby et al.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Newby C, Heaney LG, Menzies-Gow A, Niven RM, Mansur A, Bucknall C, Chaudhuri R, Thompson J, Burton P, Brightling C

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: PLoS ONE

Year: 2014

Volume: 9

Issue: 7

Online publication date: 24/07/2014

Acceptance date: 26/06/2014

Date deposited: 27/02/2018

ISSN (print): 1932-6203

Publisher: Public Library of Science

URL: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102987

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102987

PubMed id: 25058007


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share