Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Priyaa Thavasimani,
Dr Jacek CalaORCiD,
Professor Paolo MissierORCiD
Full text for this publication is not currently held within this repository. Alternative links are provided below where available.
© 2017 IEEE. Majority of workflows executed nowadays need to process a massive amount of data. Re-execution of such dataintensive scientific workflows often results in different outputs. Scientific research progresses when discoveries are reproduced and verified. However, simply re-enacting a scientific computation, such as a workflow, does not guarantee the correctness of results because of unintentional changes that may have interfered with the re-enactment process. We investigate the hypothesis that the metadata of a workflow execution can be used to explain why the experimenter observes different results (cause analysis). Similarly, Scientific metadata can be used to determine the impact of intentional variations that the experimenter may have injected into a new version of the workflow. We explore these two complementary cases using a simple algorithm for traversing two metadata traces in lock-step mode, which we illustrate through two human genomics data analysis workflows.
Author(s): Thavasimani P, Cala J, Missier P
Publication type: Conference Proceedings (inc. Abstract)
Publication status: Published
Conference Name: International Conference on Big Data
Year of Conference: 2017
Online publication date: 15/01/2018
Acceptance date: 02/04/2016
Library holdings: Search Newcastle University Library for this item