Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Maarten Vanhoof, Dr Thomas Ploetz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2018 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group In this paper, we propose a correction of the Mobility Entropy indicator (ME) used to describe the diversity of individual movement patterns as can be captured by data from mobile phones. We argue that a correction is necessary because standard calculations of ME show a structural dependency on the geographical density of observation points, rendering results biased and comparisons between regions incorrect. As a solution, we propose the Corrected Mobility Entropy (CME). We apply our solution to a French mobile phone dataset with ∼18.5 million users. Results show CME to be less correlated to cell-tower density (r = –0.17 instead of –0.59 for ME). As a spatial pattern of mobility diversity, we find CME values to be higher in suburban regions compared to their related urban centers, while both decrease considerably with lowering urban center sizes. Based on regression models, we find mobility diversity to relate to factors like income and employment. Additionally, using CME reveals the role of car use in relation to land use, which was not recognized when using ME values. Our solution enables a better description of individual mobility at a large scale, which has applications in official statistics, urban planning and policy, and mobility research.
Author(s): Vanhoof M, Schoors W, Van Rompaey A, Ploetz T, Smoreda Z
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Journal of Urban Technology
Year: 2018
Volume: 25
Issue: 2
Pages: 27-61
Print publication date: 02/04/2018
Online publication date: 04/06/2018
Acceptance date: 02/04/2018
Date deposited: 27/06/2018
ISSN (print): 1063-0732
ISSN (electronic): 1466-1853
Publisher: Routledge
URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2018.1450593
DOI: 10.1080/10630732.2018.1450593
Data Access Statement: https://doi.org/10.17634/154300-80
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric