Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

The Newcastle University research output collection, currently available on ePrints, will shortly be moving to a new open repository platform, Figshare. To prepare for the data migration we have paused adding new content to ePrints, and will resume once the new repository is launched. During this time you will continue to have access to ePrints (but no new content will appear). We will share updates here when available.

Capacity for evidence-informed policymaking across Europe: development and piloting of a multistakeholder survey

Lookup NU author(s): Dr Shelina VisramORCiD, Emeritus Professor David Hunter

Downloads


Licence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


Abstract

© 2018 The Royal Society for Public Health Objectives: Evidence-informed policymaking (EIP) is increasingly viewed as a complex endeavour that requires integration of research evidence with available resources and the preferences of those affected by the policy. The first technical expert meeting to enhance EIP in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region identified the scope to develop and conduct a survey to gather insights into the generation, translation and application of research evidence across the region. This article describes the process of developing and piloting a multistakeholder survey (promoted and technically supported by WHO/Europe) on the topic of capacity for EIP. Study design: Rapid review and pilot cross-sectional survey. Methods: A survey instrument was developed based on findings from the published literature and refined with input from EIP experts/champions. The online survey was then piloted using various recruitment strategies designed to maximise its reach among the key target groups (senior researchers, knowledge brokers and members of civil society). Results: The rapid review revealed a clear gap in the evidence base in relation to broader surveys of capacity for EIP, as opposed to evidence-based practice at an individual level. Thirteen responses to the pilot survey were received from individuals in 10 European countries. Reported barriers to EIP included a lack of understanding among policymakers and a lack of interaction with researchers. There were examples of efforts to enhance capacity for EIP, both at region or country level and through membership of international networks and collaborations. However, few examples were given of the application and impact of research evidence on the policymaking process. Conclusion: This research has demonstrated the feasibility of developing and piloting a multicountry, multistakeholder survey to generate better understanding of evidence use in health policymaking. Next steps include incorporating the lessons learned into a revised version of the survey to be implemented with all 53 WHO/Europe Member States.


Publication metadata

Author(s): Visram S, Hunter DJ, Kuchenmuller T

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Public Health

Year: 2018

Volume: 163

Pages: 54-60

Print publication date: 01/10/2018

Online publication date: 06/08/2018

Acceptance date: 05/06/2018

Date deposited: 02/07/2018

ISSN (print): 0033-3506

ISSN (electronic): 1476-5616

Publisher: Elsevier B.V.

URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.007

DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.007


Altmetrics

Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Share