Browse by author
Lookup NU author(s): Dr Michael GraylingORCiD, Professor James WasonORCiD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
© 2018 The Authors. Biometrical Journal Published by WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim. The ability to accurately estimate the sample size required by a stepped-wedge (SW) cluster randomized trial (CRT) routinely depends upon the specification of several nuisance parameters. If these parameters are misspecified, the trial could be overpowered, leading to increased cost, or underpowered, enhancing the likelihood of a false negative. We address this issue here for cross-sectional SW-CRTs, analyzed with a particular linear-mixed model, by proposing methods for blinded and unblinded sample size reestimation (SSRE). First, blinded estimators for the variance parameters of a SW-CRT analyzed using the Hussey and Hughes model are derived. Following this, procedures for blinded and unblinded SSRE after any time period in a SW-CRT are detailed. The performance of these procedures is then examined and contrasted using two example trial design scenarios. We find that if the two key variance parameters were underspecified by 50%, the SSRE procedures were able to increase power over the conventional SW-CRT design by up to 41%, resulting in an empirical power above the desired level. Thus, though there are practical issues to consider, the performance of the procedures means researchers should consider incorporating SSRE in to future SW-CRTs.
Author(s): Grayling MJ, Mander AP, Wason JMS
Publication type: Article
Publication status: Published
Journal: Biometrical Journal
Year: 2018
Volume: 60
Issue: 5
Pages: 903-916
Print publication date: 01/09/2018
Online publication date: 03/08/2018
Acceptance date: 27/06/2018
Date deposited: 08/03/2019
ISSN (print): 0323-3847
ISSN (electronic): 1521-4036
Publisher: Wiley-VCH Verlag
URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.201700125
DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201700125
Altmetrics provided by Altmetric