Toggle Main Menu Toggle Search

Open Access padlockePrints

Methodological fallacies and perceptions of rural disparity: how rural proofing addresses real versus abstract needs

Lookup NU author(s): Professor Sally Shortall



This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND).


In 2016, the EU committed to ‘rural proofing’ its policies. Rural proofing has now become a priority across Europe. Prior to this, rural proofing or mainstreaming, the reviewing of universal policies to ensure comparable treatment of rural areas, was relatively unique to England and Northern Ireland. The first case of legislating rural proofing has occurred with The Rural Needs Act (Northern Ireland) 2016. Qualitative data was collected from civil and public servants with experience of pre-legislative ‘rural proofing’, as well as those facing new responsibilities under the Act. Additional data was obtained from key informants active in agricultural, environmental, or rural organisations. Several key findings emerge, all underpinned by a central issue: that the approach entirely stands on an assumption of rural disadvantage, the nature of which is never articulated. We argue that this is not driven by a lack of evidence, but by a more fundamental problem: the pervasiveness of viewing rural issues through a lens tinted by methodological fallacies. Failure to correct for these weaknesses by means of a dynamic theory of rural leads to flawed policy, because it is designed to treat disparity rather than accommodate diversity. In other words, it is premised on a binary of urban/ rural. The findings of this research will inform the development of rural proofing policies going forward.

Publication metadata

Author(s): Sherry E, Shortall S

Publication type: Article

Publication status: Published

Journal: Journal of Rural Studies

Year: 2019

Volume: 68

Pages: 336-343

Print publication date: 01/05/2019

Online publication date: 20/12/2018

Acceptance date: 01/11/2018

Date deposited: 13/11/2018

ISSN (print): 0743-0167

ISSN (electronic): 1873-1392

Publisher: Pergamon Press


DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.12.005


Altmetrics provided by Altmetric


Funder referenceFunder name
Evidence and Innovation Project Number 15/2/02